Over at Gitlin Law Blog, Illinois family law attorney Joe Gitlin muses that marriages break down when (to use a metaphor which dates both him and me) the spouses aren't "building from the same blueprint".
This is consistent with my take: the crux of the decision to divorce isn't usually specifically about money, or sex, or intimacy, it's that moment, a year, a decade, four decades into the marriage, when one spouse says "This ISN'T the deal I thought I signed on for!"
I consult with folks frequently about whether they need, or want, a pre-marital agreement. The first part of that conversation explores whether the client, and the spouse-to-be, have ever talked seriously about the sorts of things that a pre-marital agreement might address: who's going to control the money? Are both spouses going to have accounts for "their own" money, and a joint "pot" out of which they'll pay joint expenses? Is the plan that one spouse will work, and the other will be a stay-at-home parent for a number of years? If one owns a house, what's the other's expectation as to what's going to happen with that house after the marriage?
Even if folks are okay with the "off-the-shelf" marriage contract, if they understand it, and each understands in advance what the other's expectations are, the chances that they'll manage a lasting marriage are increased.
With all respect to my friends in the floral, couture, and catering industries, marriage planning's less romantic, but more important than wedding planning, and almost nothing is less romantic than divorce court...
Showing posts with label divorce insurance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label divorce insurance. Show all posts
Friday, September 24, 2010
Sunday, July 4, 2010
Prenups On The Way Up For Boomers
...or so says the Wall Street Journal.
Possible explanations (none exclusive, and none clearly verifiable) include:
that boomers divorce more frequently, and live longer, than their parents, and thus have a higher rate of re-marriage;
or that our lives are simply overwhelmed by fear of litigation; or
that the financial crisis has simply taken some of the romance out of romance.
. . . and apparently the Australians, who've only had pre-marital agreements recognized for about the last decade, are way ahead of the U.S., with a recent report saying that ten percent of couples are using them.
Possible explanations (none exclusive, and none clearly verifiable) include:
that boomers divorce more frequently, and live longer, than their parents, and thus have a higher rate of re-marriage;
or that our lives are simply overwhelmed by fear of litigation; or
that the financial crisis has simply taken some of the romance out of romance.
. . . and apparently the Australians, who've only had pre-marital agreements recognized for about the last decade, are way ahead of the U.S., with a recent report saying that ten percent of couples are using them.
Monday, March 8, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)